US Supreme Court Archives - Page 3 of 11

How Can Employers Protect Workers Who Seek Abortion Care?

by David Quinn Gacioch and Sarah Raaii | Aug 17, 2022 | Benefit Controversies, Employee Benefits, Health and Welfare Plans

As US states seek to reduce abortion access in the wake of the overturning of Roe v. Wade, how can employers protect workers who seek abortion care? In this Fortune article, McDermott’s David Gacioch, Sarah Raaii and Ellen Bronchetti offer insight into what the US Supreme Court’s decision means for employee healthcare data, employee benefits and Title VII.

“Any employer who doesn’t already have an assessment of what the end of Roe means for its operations and workforce…needs to get in front of this,” Gacioch said.

Access the article.

Hospitals Shouldn’t Expect Quick Pay Despite 340B Win

by Emily J. Cook | Aug 2, 2022 | Benefit Controversies, Employee Benefits, Health and Welfare Plans

340B hospitals should not expect to receive withheld program funds anytime soon despite a recent US Supreme Court ruling. According to this Becker’s Hospital Review article, the Court reversed a 2020 federal appeals court ruling that found that the US Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) had the authority to make a $1.6 billion annual reimbursement cut to the program under its Medicare Outpatient Prospective Payment System (OPPS). McDermott Partner Emily J. Cook said that the ruling will not result in any immediate changes to Medicare payments for 340B drugs nor require that HHS restore the full payment rates for the drugs.

Access the article.

Fired for Having an Abortion? Unlikely, but It’s Complicated

by Sarah Raaii | Jul 28, 2022 | Benefit Controversies, Employee Benefits, Health and Welfare Plans

Could a worker be fired for having an abortion? According to this Insider article, workplace laws would likely protect pregnant people from discrimination. McDermott’s Sarah Raaii said employers should make sure abortion health plan coverage does not conflict with federal laws.

“Incorporating abortion benefits into an employer’s existing health plan might help mitigate worker privacy concerns,” Raaii said, “since health plans are subject to the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA).”

Read more here.

Abortion Questions Swirl Over Health Lawyers in Post-Roe World

by Stacey Callaghan and David Quinn Gacioch | Jul 27, 2022 | Benefit Controversies, Employee Benefits, Health and Welfare Plans

Following the US Supreme Court’s decision to overturn Roe v. Wade, health lawyers have been busy making sense of the legal implications of the court’s landmark ruling. In this Law360 article, McDermott Partners Stacey Callaghan and David Gacioch offer insight into the myriad of questions they’ve received from hospitals, pharmacies, telemedicine platforms, investors and other players in the industry.

“The field against whom [abortion restrictions] can be enforced becomes so much broader,” Gacioch said. “It’s such a sea change.”

Access the article.

Workers’ Abortion Privacy at Risk as Texas Targets Employer Aid

by Scott Weinstein | Jul 25, 2022 | Benefit Controversies, Employee Benefits, Health and Welfare Plans

A group of conservative Texas lawmakers is warning employers of potential civil or criminal consequences if they offer out-of-state abortion access to their employees. In this Bloomberg Law article, McDermott Partner Scott Weinstein said many companies offering reproductive healthcare benefits are making sure such benefits aren’t tied to a particular procedure.

“The goal is not to know,” Weinstein said.

Read more here.

Complex Patchwork of Laws Await Companies Offering Out-of-State Abortion Travel

by Sarah Raaii | Jul 19, 2022 | Benefit Controversies, Employee Benefits, Health and Welfare Plans

Employers seeking to provide their employees with abortion services are facing a dizzying patchwork of laws that differ from state to state, according to this Corporate Counsel article. McDermott’s Sarah Raaii said companies with employees in multiple states “would really need to do a state-by-state analysis of what the abortion laws are, whether and under what circumstances abortion is legal in most states.”

Access the article.

HHS Supreme Court Loss Previews Low-Income Drug Discount Fight

by Emily J. Cook | Jul 12, 2022 | Benefit Controversies, Employee Benefits, Health and Welfare Plans

A recent US Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) US Supreme Court loss involving drug reimbursements to hospitals may impact a larger battle over drug discounts for low-income Americans. According to this Blomberg Law article, the Court ruled in June that HHS improperly cut $1 billion a year in drug reimbursements to hospitals through a government program that assists at-need populations. Now, both HHS and hospitals may be on the same side of a different skirmish—whether the agency can require pharmaceutical companies to offer discounts to specific pharmacies. McDermott Partner Emily Jane Cook said language in the Court’s opinion “suggests that the court does have a very favorable view of the 340B program and the hospitals that participate in that program.”

Read more here.

State Abortion Bans Signal Chaos for Providers

by Stacey Callaghan and David Quinn Gacioch | Jul 8, 2022 | Benefit Controversies, Employee Benefits, Health and Welfare Plans

The US Supreme Court’s decision to overturn Roe v. Wade will generate a minefield of legal and criminal implications for healthcare providers, according to this Healthcare Dive article. McDermott Partners Stacey Callaghan and David Gacioch offer insight into what these restrictive state laws could mean for providers.

Access the article.

Employers, Employees Search for Answers After Dobbs Decision

by Sarah Raaii | Jul 7, 2022 | Benefit Controversies, Employee Benefits, Health and Welfare Plans

The US Supreme Court’s decision to overturn Roe v. Wade has left employers—and employees—with more questions than answers. While many employers have promised to pay for their employees to travel across state lines for an abortion, it’s unclear if employers might be sued for doing so. In this USA TODAY article, McDermott’s Sarah Raaii said employers may point to Justice Brett Kavanaugh’s opinion on the “constitutional right to interstate travel” for support.

Read more here.

US Supreme Court Ruling Complicates Abortion Insurance Coverage

by Sarah Raaii | Jul 1, 2022 | Benefit Controversies, Employee Benefits, Health and Welfare Plans

The patchwork of US federal and state rules governing abortion insurance coverage will become more complicated following the US Supreme Court’s decision to overturn Roe v. Wade. In this MarketWatch article, McDermott’s Sarah Raaii said the situation has employers on edge.

“We’ve had a huge influx of employers reaching out and asking, ‘What should I be doing? Are there risks?’” Raaii said.

Access the article.