US Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit Archives

Breaking Down the New No Surprises Act FAQs Post-TMA III

by Drew Elizabeth McCormick, Jamie Gelfman, Kristen O'Brien, Jeffrey Davis and Abygail Hoey | Mar 25, 2025 | Employee Benefits, Health and Welfare Plans

On January 14, 2025, the US Departments of Labor, Health and Human Services, and the Treasury, along with the Office of Personnel Management, released Part 69 of a series of FAQs aimed at helping stakeholders understand and comply with the federal No Surprises Act.

This latest set of FAQs focuses on how health plans and issuers should determine the qualifying payment amount and includes updates to disclosure and patient cost-sharing requirements, reflecting the recent rulings by the US District Court for the Eastern District of Texas and the US Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit in the case of Texas Medical Association, et al. v. United States Department of Health and Human Services, et al.

Read more here.

Federal Vaccine Mandates Are Back in Play (For Now)

by Michelle S. Strowhiro, Abigail M. Kagan and Sandra M. DiVarco | Dec 22, 2021 | Employee Benefits, Employment, Health and Welfare Plans, Labor

The courts continue to move the vaccine mandate goalposts on employers as dozens of legal challenges work their way through the courts. The latest developments are major game changers for employers. As of today, the US Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) Emergency Temporary Standard (ETS) vaccine-or-test rule is enforceable nationwide, and the US Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) Interim Final Rule (IFR) mandating vaccination, subject to exemptions, is enforceable in 25 states.

Read more here.

Fifth Circuit Brings Enforcement Back into the Mix: The Latest Court Moves with the CMS Vaccination Mandate

by Sandra M. DiVarco, Brian Stimson, Kristen O'Brien and McDermott Will & Emery | Dec 21, 2021 | Employee Benefits, Employment, Health and Welfare Plans, Labor

A flurry of litigation in federal district and appellate courts has led to an even split between states in which the COVID-19 vaccine mandate issued by the US Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) may be implemented and states in which such implementation has been prevented. Additional appeals are expected shortly; however, the practical effect of these decisions on enforcement of the CMS mandate remains uncertain.

Read more here.

Businesses Left in Limbo on COVID-19 Mandate

by Michelle S. Strowhiro | Nov 15, 2021 | Employee Benefits, Employment, Health and Welfare Plans, Labor

Following a US Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit decision to temporarily block the Occupational Safety and Health Administration’s (OSHA) new vaccine requirement rule, many employers have found themselves in a state of confusion. According to this article published in The Hill, businesses could face steep penalties if they willfully violate the rule, such as fines of more than $130,000. But even though the rule is temporarily blocked, McDermott Partner Michelle Strowhiro said businesses should continue preparing for important OSHA deadlines.

“I think it’s prudent for employers to proceed with planning assuming that the OSHA rule, at least in some form or fashion, will be implemented pending final resolution of the various court cases,” Strowhiro said.

Access the article.

Federal Appeals Court Temporarily Blocks New OSHA Rule

by Abigail M. Kagan, Dawn Peacock, Michelle S. Strowhiro, Sandra M. DiVarco and Kristen O'Brien | Nov 9, 2021 | Employee Benefits, Employment, Health and Welfare Plans, Labor

On November 6, 2021, the US Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit temporarily blocked the Emergency Temporary Standard (ETS) issued on November 4, 2021, by the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) requiring employers with 100 or more employees to implement COVID-19 vaccination policies. The ETS is stayed until further notice, halting its implementation temporarily. While the future of the ETS remains uncertain, employers may want to continue preparing for the ETS as if it is going to take effect while litigation continues.

Read more here.

District Court Dismisses Shareholder Claim that Equity Award Share Withholding Triggers Section 16(b) Liability

by Andrew Liazos, Eric Orsic and Thomas P. Conaghan | Jun 13, 2017 | Benefit Controversies, Employee Benefits, Employment, Executive Compensation

A US District Court recently dismissed a claim that an insider’s election to satisfy an income tax obligation by having shares withheld from the delivery of an award constituted a non-exempt sale of shares back to the issuer for purposes of Section 16(b) of the Exchange Act, unless the share withholding was required, rather than merely permitted.

While an encouraging development, this decision is now on appeal to the US Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit and there are similar unresolved complaints in other jurisdictions. Until this matter is resolved, public companies should continue to consider what steps are appropriate to avoid Section 16 exposure and to review this situation with their executive officers.

Read the full article.

Understanding the Federal Court Injunction against the DOL’s Revised Overtime Rule and Determining What to Do Next

by McDermott Will & Emery | Nov 29, 2016 | Employee Benefits, Employment, Labor

A federal district court judge in Texas issued an order granting a temporary injunction late Tuesday against the Department of Labor’s new overtime exemption rule that was scheduled to take effect December 1. This article contains some practical tips on what employers should do next.

Read the full article.