During arguments in a case seeking to eliminate Obamacare, two of the US Supreme Court’s conservative justices signaled they would not strike down the landmark legislation. In a recent article by CNBC, McDermott partner Michael Kimberly discussed the significance of this case and the Court’s upcoming decision.
The Internal Revenue Service (IRS) has released final regulations on the requirement that individuals maintain health insurance that meets the minimum essential coverage standard (the “individual mandate”). These regulations give clarity to Professional Employer Organizations (PEOs) offering group health plan coverage to employees on behalf of an employer. An individual can satisfy the minimum essential coverage requirement by maintaining coverage under an eligible employer-sponsored plan. The final regulations provide that an eligible employer-sponsored plan includes coverage offered by a PEO on behalf of an employer. Specifically, the definition of eligible employer-sponsored plan in the final regulations (Section 1.5000A-2(c)) provides that an eligible employer-sponsored plan includes, in addition to coverage offered by an employer, (i) group health insurance coverage offered on behalf of an employer to an employee and (ii) a self-insured group health plan under which coverage is offered by, or on behalf of, an employer to the employee. In addition, the preamble to the final regulations explicitly states that organizations such as PEOs can offer coverage under an eligible employer-sponsored plan on behalf of an employer, yet not be viewed as the employer by reason of offering such coverage (“commentators asked whether a plan offered to an employer’s employees by a third party, such as a professional employer organization or leasing company, is an eligible employer-sponsored plan for the employees eligible to participate in the plan. The final regulations are revised to provide that a plan offered by an employer to an employee includes a plan offered to an employee on behalf of an employer. No inference is intended from this treatment that the third party is the employer for this or any other provision of the Code or related laws.”).
The final regulations are expected to be published in the Federal Register on August 30, 2013.
by Amy M. Gordon, Susan M. Nash and Maureen O’Brien
On June 28, 2012, the Supreme Court upheld the most significant provisions of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (the Act), including the controversial individual mandate. The vote was 5-4 and the majority opinion was written by Chief Justice John Roberts. Ironically, the justices concluded that the mandate was not a valid exercise of Congress’ commerce clause power but was a proper use of Congress’ tax authority. One of the most complicated issues that everyone struggled with, the severability issue, is now moot because the individual mandate was upheld.
Click here to view the Supreme Court opinion.
Please join us for a webcast discussing the opinion on Friday June 29, 2012, from 12:00-2:00 p.m. EDT. To register, click here.
Subscribe
