income tax
Subscribe to income tax's Posts

Protecting Employees’ Tax Position After a Spin-Off

Spin-offs have become increasingly popular with innovative companies as a method of unlocking shareholder value, but the transaction is not always tax-free, particularly for international employees holding equity awards or shares.

The ability to obtain tax-free treatment in the United States for both the company and shareholders in a spin-off is often attractive. However, the transaction is not always tax-free for shareholders located outside the US. When local country criteria are not met, the distribution of spin-co shares is taxable for shareholders.

Significantly, employees holding equity awards and company shares can be negatively affected by a spin-off, which can have a significant impact on morale at a very sensitive time in a spin-co’s evolution.

Companies generally take one of two approaches when adjusting equity awards in a spin-off: either a basket approach, where employees hold equity awards from both companies; or a concentration approach, where employees only retain equity awards from their post-spin employer. The basket approach raises more local tax and securities compliance issues than the concentration approach as the employee is holding awards from a company that is not their employer.

“Long” shares held by employees in an employer’s plan raise additional issues. The applicable tax analysis mirrors the analysis applicable to shareholders generally, which may or may not be taxable upon distribution, depending on the country. However, the tax result may differ when the shares are held in a trust or where the employee does not yet have full ownership of the shares. In certain cases, a local tax ruling should be submitted, potentially providing the employees with more favorable tax treatment than regular shareholders.

Tax-qualified equity awards also require consideration as the tax-advantaged treatment may be lost for the employees in many countries. For example, in the United Kingdom, Share Incentive Plans (SIPs) and Company Share Option Plans (CSOPs) are common equity awards and a spin-off impacts them differently.

When an employee holds shares in a SIP for five years, the employee may sell the shares without paying income tax or national insurance contributions. However, when a spin-off transaction does not meet the UK “demerger” rules for a tax-free spin-off, the SIP participants will be subject to taxation on the value of the distributed spin-co shares when they are distributed.

If an employee exercises CSOP options three or more years after grant, that employee doesn’t pay income tax at exercise for the difference between the exercise price and the current fair market value of the shares. Any adjustment of the CSOP awards results in the loss of tax-qualified treatment, subjecting the employee to income taxation when the options are exercised. Employees who have already met the three year requirement may therefore prefer to exercise the awards prior to the spin-off.

In most cases, particularly if the communication occurs shortly before the spin-off, employees do not fully understand the ramifications until it is too late to mitigate the tax impact. To avoid this, companies should communicate the tax implications to employees well before the spin-off, taking into [...]

Continue Reading




read more

UK Tax Perspective on Expatriates Working Abroad

UK employees “working from anywhere” face fines or investigations from foreign tax authorities if they stay too long, become a resident in a foreign country for tax purposes and fail to declare their UK incomes. In some cases, they could also be hit with double taxation on the same earnings.

In a recent article in The Daily Telegraph, McDermott partner Simon Goldring advises employees to consider the tax implications of extended “work from home” abroad.

Access the article.




read more

IRS Extends HSA Contribution Deadline to July 15, 2020

Overview

A new IRS notice extends the deadline for individuals to make health savings account (HSA) contributions from April 15, 2020 to July 15, 2020.  The IRS issued the notice to provide taxpayers with various tax filing and payment deadline extensions in response to the ongoing COVID-19 emergency.

In Depth

In response to the COVID-19 emergency, the IRS has issued Notice 2020-18, which extends certain tax filing and payment deadlines.  All taxpayers with filing or payment deadlines of April 15, 2020 are eligible for relief under the Notice, regardless of whether they are directly impacted by COVID-19 (for example, due to illness or quarantine).  The Notice extends the deadline for individuals to make contributions to their health savings accounts from April 15, 2020 to July 15, 2020.

HSAs allow individuals who are covered under high-deductible health plans (HDHPs) to contribute an amount up to IRS limits ($3,550 for individual coverage and $7,100 for family coverage in 2020), which is used to pay for certain eligible medical expenses on a pre-tax basis.  HSA contributions are typically due by the federal income tax filing deadline of April 15.  Because that deadline has now been extended to July 15, 2020, the IRS has also extended the deadline to make HSA contributions until the new filing deadline.

Earlier this month, the IRS allowed individuals covered by an HDHP to receive testing and care for COVID-19 without a deductible, or with a deductible below the HDHP minimum, without disqualifying the individual from making or receiving HSA contributions (see our previous On the Subject here).




read more

Supplemental Benefit Planning for Tax-Exempt Employers

Tax-exempt employers face a matrix of tax and disclosure issues in designing an appropriate supplement retirement program. This resource intends to examine the income tax, payroll tax and Form 990 reporting aspects of the major plans currently available to tax-exempt employers, and review those major plans from the reference point of several major design considerations.

Continue Reading.




read more

Camp Tax Reform Proposal Targets Executive Compensation

On February 26, 2014, U.S. House of Representatives Committee on Ways and Means Chairman Dave Camp (R-Mich.) released the proposed Tax Reform Act of 2014 (the Camp Proposal).  In addition to simplifying the Internal Revenue Code (IRC) and reducing corporate and individual tax rates, the Camp Proposal would fundamentally change the income tax rules that apply to nonqualified deferred compensation arrangements and would further restrict tax deductions available to publicly held corporation when paying named executive officers.  It would also impose a new excise tax on employees of certain tax-exempt organizations who receive excessive compensation and certain payments that are contingent upon a change in control.  Although unlikely to be enacted this year, the Camp Proposal provides a blueprint for other legislators to propose tax law changes that would significantly impact current executive compensation practices.  Given the current political environment and the way tax revenue is estimated by Congress when preparing budgets, it is likely that we have not seen the last of the executive compensation changes included in the Camp Proposal, which makes it important to understand how they work and what they would mean for current executive compensation programs.

Read the full article.




read more

BLOG EDITORS

STAY CONNECTED

TOPICS

ARCHIVES

Top ranked chambers 2022
US leading firm 2022