Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974
Subscribe to Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974's Posts

Senate Unanimously Approves Bill Modifying ERISA Section 4062(e)

On September 16, 2014, the United States Senate unanimously approved Senate Bill 2511, which would amend Section 4062(e) of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974, as amended (ERISA), to clarify the definition of substantial cessation of operations.  ERISA Section 4062(e) enables the Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation to require that employers financially guarantee pension obligations based on a plan’s underfunded termination liability when an employer that maintains a pension plan shuts down operations at a facility, and as a result, more than 20 percent of the employer’s employees who are plan participants incur a separation from employment.

The bill revises ERISA Section 4062(e) to clarify that a “substantial cessation of operations” occurs when an employer permanently ceases operations at a facility and, as a result, there is a “workforce reduction” of more than 15 percent of all eligible employees at all facilities in the contributing employer’s controlled group.  Under the amendment, a “workforce reduction” would mean the number of eligible employees at a facility who are separated from employment by reason of the permanent cessation of operations of the employer at the facility.  Certain eligible employees would be excluded from the reduction analysis, including employees who, within a reasonable period of time, are replaced by the employer, at the same or another facility in the United States, by an employee who is a citizen or resident of the United States.  In addition, employees would not be not taken into consideration for these purposes following the sale or other disposition of the assets or stock of the employer if the acquiring entity maintains the single-employer plan of the predecessor employer that includes assets and liabilities attributable to the accrued benefit of the employee and either (1) the employee is separated from employment at the facility, but within a reasonable period of time, is replaced by the acquiring entity by an employee who is a citizen or resident of the United States, or (2) the eligible employees continues to be employed at the facility of the acquiring entity.

The Congressional Budget Office estimates that Senate Bill 2511 would reduce the contributions that plan sponsors are required to make to their plans as a result of terminating operations at a facility, leading to increases in employer revenues and decreases in direct spending.  The House of Representatives concluded its fall session on September 19, 2014 without acting on the bill.  It remains to be seen whether the House will take up the Senate bill when it returns for a “lame-duck” session after the mid-term elections.




read more

Cracking the Code: Taxing Developments in Benefit Compliance

When a nonqualified deferred compensation plan qualifies as a “top-hat” plan under the regulations of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974, as amended (“ERISA”), the benefits of that particular classification to an employer are that the plan is exempt from various reporting, disclosure and funding rules.  These exemptions can significantly ease an employer’s administration and maintenance of a nonqualified deferred compensation plan.  Because of this simplicity, employers are more willing to offer these types of nonqualified deferred compensation arrangements and thereby offer an additional tax deferral opportunity to the select group of employees participating in the plan.  However, not appropriately qualifying for the top-hat exemption means that a non-qualified deferred compensation plan can be recharacterized as a tax-qualified plan and therefore, unintentionally being required to legally expand eligibility for the deferred compensation plan to a much larger, unanticipated group of employees.  Therefore, getting the top-hat qualification right is critical for the plan sponsor’s protection.

Read the full article.

Reprinted with the permission of ThomsonReuters, © 2014, all rights reserved.




read more

Developments Impacting Benefits for Same-Sex Spouses

As federal and state agencies and courts further examine the implications of the Supreme Court of the United States’ ruling on same-sex marriage in U.S. v. Windsor, the laws and regulations governing employee benefits for employees’ same-sex spouses continue to be clarified.  As a result, employers should monitor additional guidance as it is issued and continue to reevaluate the same-sex spousal benefits offered under their employee benefit plans.

Read the full article.




read more

DOL Issues Guidance on Plan Asset Status of Revenue Sharing Payments

The U.S. Department of Labor (DOL) recently issued guidance on whether accounts holding revenue sharing payments constitute “plan assets” under ERISA.  Prior to the issuance of the DOL guidance, it was unclear whether these amounts would be deemed to be ERISA plan assets.  If such amounts were treated as ERISA plan assets, they would be subject to various requirements under ERISA.  The DOL also addressed the responsibilities of plan fiduciaries in evaluating revenue sharing agreements.  Plan fiduciaries should review their current revenue sharing arrangements in light of the new DOL guidance.

To read the full article, click here.




read more

BLOG EDITORS

STAY CONNECTED

TOPICS

ARCHIVES

Top ranked chambers 2022
US leading firm 2022