ACA
Subscribe to ACA's Posts

U.S. Department of Labor Issues Proposed Regulations Amending the COBRA Notice Requirements

On May 2, 2014, the U.S. Department of Labor (DOL) Employee Benefits Security Administration (EBSA) issued proposed regulations which seek to amend the notice requirements under the Consolidated Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act (COBRA).  The changes are intended “to better align the provision of guidance under the COBRA notice requirements with the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (ACA) provisions already in effect, as well as any provisions of federal law that will become applicable in the future.”

Under COBRA, a group health plan must provide participants with a general COBRA notice and COBRA qualified beneficiaries with an election notice.  These notices describe a qualified beneficiary’s right to continue coverage under a group health plan.  On May 8, 2013, DOL issued Technical Release 2013-02, which included a series of model COBRA notices (see “Notice of Coverage Options Available Through the Exchanges” for more information).  These model notices include references to the ACA, noting that some qualified beneficiaries (1) may want to consider and compare health coverage alternatives to COBRA continuation coverage that are available through the ACA exchanges and (2) may also be eligible for a premium tax credit to help pay for the cost of coverage.

The proposed regulations eliminate the current versions of the model notices.  However, until the regulations are finalized and effective, the DOL will consider appropriately completed use of the model notices that are currently available on its website to constitute good faith compliance with the notice content requirements of COBRA.  Once the current notices are available, they will be posted at the following links:

Note: Use of the model notices is not required.




read more

2015 Notice of Benefit and Payment Parameters

The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services’ Final Notice of Benefit and Payment Parameters for 2015 contains numerous alterations to premium stabilization programs, cost-sharing requirements and employee counting provisions to account for lower-than-anticipated enrollment through the Exchanges and the Obama Administration’s decision to permit individuals to “keep their current plan” through 2016.  All of these changes and the fluid regulatory environment create significant challenges for issuers, who must operationalize these changes, some of which are effective in 2014, and prepare for the 2015 benefit year.

Please click here to read the full newsletter.




read more

Proposed Regulations on Excepted Benefits Provide Guidelines, but Employers Should Watch for Final Rules

On December 24, 2013, the Departments of Labor, Health and Human Services, and the Treasury issued highly anticipated proposed regulations that would amend the definition of limited excepted benefits.  Excepted benefits are generally exempt from the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act’s (ACA) market reform requirements. The proposed rules would be effective for plan years beginning in 2015. While the proposed regulations provide guidelines on excepted benefits, employers should watch for the final rules to accurately design ACA-compliant excepted benefits plans. To get a better handle on how the proposed rules on excepted benefits impact employers, Wolters Kluwer of Employee Benefits Management Directions, spoke with Joanna C. Kerpen, partner in the employee benefits practice group at McDermott Will & Emery.

Read the full article.




read more

Feds’ Argument in Favor of Premium Tax Credit Gains Momentum, Still Under Attack in Federal Courts

A second federal district court judge has ruled in favor of the government on one of the most serious challenges to the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act of 2010 (ACA).  The court dismissed a challenge to the availability of premium tax credits under the ACA.  The plaintiffs now have appeals pending in two federal circuits, and similar challenges remain pending in two other federal trial courts.

Click here to read the full article.




read more

Proposed Regulations Expand the Definition of Excepted Benefits

Recently issued proposed regulations would expand the categories of excepted benefits under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (ERISA), the Internal Revenue Code (the Code) and the Public Health Service Act.  In general, excepted benefits are exempt from the market reform and certain other requirements added to ERISA and the Code by the Affordable Care Act.

Click here to read the full article.




read more

View From McDermott: Employer Pay-or-Play Mandates Under Health-Care Reform

Open enrollment is well underway for individuals and small employers under the state and federally facilitated marketplace exchanges created by the Affordable Care Act.

As exchange coverage becomes available, many employers are in the process of evaluating whether, or at what level, to continue to offer health insurance benefits to their employees.  Some employers are staying the course and offering robust medical plan choices to their employees.  Others are turning to private health exchanges for solutions and still others are deciding that their employees may be better off obtaining subsidized coverage in the state or federally facilitated marketplace exchanges.

A large part of this decision turns on whether an employer will incur tax penalties for failure to offer adequate coverage to its employees and whether its employees will, in fact, be better off obtaining coverage elsewhere.

To read the full article, click here.

*Reproduced with permission from Bloomberg BNA Pension & Benefits Daily.




read more

Employer Obligations for Additional Medicare Tax

The Internal Revenue Service recently released final regulations and updated questions and answers to help employers and taxpayers comply with the new 0.9 percent Medicare payroll tax increase on high-income earners that became effective in 2013. Employers are responsible for withholding and reporting the increased payroll tax and may be liable for amounts that are not withheld. Employers should check with their payroll service providers to make sure they are compliant for 2013 and, if not, make any necessary corrections by the last payroll of 2013 to avoid potential liability or penalties.

The Internal Revenue Service (IRS) recently issued final regulations relating to the additional Hospital Insurance (HI) tax on income above threshold amounts (the Additional Medicare Tax), as added by the Affordable Care Act. The IRS also issued updated Questions and Answers for the Additional Medicare Tax. Employers are responsible for withholding and reporting the 0.9 percent Additional Medicare Tax, which became effective in 2013. If an employer fails to withhold the correct amount from wages it pays to an employee, the employer may be liable for the amount not withheld and subject to applicable penalties.

Background

In general, employees and their employers must each pay a Medicare tax, at a rate of 1.45 percent, on the entire amount of the employees’ wages. Effective for employees beginning in 2013, the 0.9 percent Additional Medicare Tax is imposed on individuals for wages in excess of $250,000 for married taxpayers filing jointly, $125,000 for married taxpayers filing separately and $200,000 for single taxpayers. Thus, for high-wage earners, the employer portion of the Medicare tax remains at 1.45 percent, but the employee portion can be a total of 2.35 percent of wages in excess of the threshold amounts.

Employer Obligations

To comply with the Additional Medicare Tax requirement, employers must withhold the 0.9 percent Additional Medicare Tax from wages it pays to an employee in excess of $200,000 in a calendar year, without regard to the employee’s filing status, wages paid by another employer or income from self-employment. Thus, generally the employer need not obtain additional information from the employee regarding the employee’s expected actual liability to withhold amounts due under the Additional Medicare Tax. Note that the withholding obligation exists even if an employee is not ultimately liable for the Additional Medicare Tax (e.g., if an employee’s wages together with those of his or her spouse do not exceed the $250,000 for married taxpayers filing jointly). On the other hand, an employer is not required to withhold the Additional Medicare Tax so long as the employee’s wages do not exceed $200,000, even if the employer has reason to believe the employee will be liable for the Additional Medicare Tax (e.g., if an employee and his or her spouse each earn $150,000). Employers are required to begin withholding Additional Medicare Tax in the pay period in which the employer pays wages in excess of $200,000 to an employee.

Employers that do not deduct and withhold the Additional Medicare Tax are [...]

Continue Reading




read more

BLOG EDITORS

STAY CONNECTED

TOPICS

ARCHIVES

Top ranked chambers 2022
US leading firm 2022