The Supreme Court recently clarified the scope of SEC whistleblower retaliation provisions. Though the decision limits retaliation actions, employers should continue to avoid conduct that can be interpreted as retaliation under other statutes, and should find ways to encourage internal reporting.
SEC Whistleblower Update
By Paul Helms on March 13, 2018
Posted In Employment
Paul HelmsPaul Helms defends clients in government investigations, principally investigations by the US Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), and conducts internal investigations involving securities, accounting and other financial concerns. Through his work at the SEC and in private practice, Paul handled more than 40 investigations across multiple subject areas, including financial and accounting fraud, offering fraud, market manipulation, insider trading, Foreign Corrupt Practices Act (FCPA) violations and regulatory compliance. Paul has substantial experience in matters involving investment advisers, mutual funds and private funds. Read Paul Helms' full bio.
Related Posts
- Ninth Circuit En Banc Ruling Deepens Rift Over Gender-Based Pay Gaps
- 4 Things to Watch After the High Court’s Body Blow to Labor
- 2016 Proxy Season Checklist – What You Need to Know
- US Supreme Court Rules Highly Compensated Employee Is Not Exempt from Overtime
- ‘Unprecedented Interest’ in Employer-Covered Abortion Travel
BLOG EDITORS
STAY CONNECTED
TOPICS
ARCHIVES
RECENT POSTS
- New Year, New Rules: Global Equity and Employment Law Considerations for Calendar Year 2025
- Looking Ahead to 2025: Global Labor & Employment Legal Update
- No Surprises Act Implementation Under the Trump Administration
- Webinar Recording: Understanding the Basics of Payor Contracting
- Complying With the ‘Relevant Data’ Requirement Under the Final 2024 Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act: A Proposal for a Workable Alternative
